Author Archives: pgverifysoft

Low code allows domain experts who are not necessarily programming professionals to build software systems. However, this increases the quality requirements for the components used. These are “classic” software, which was developed and tested (hopefully) conscientiously, evenly under use of all means for the quality assurance such as static analysis, code reviews and complete tests.Continue reading “How Do You Assess The Role Of Low Code / No Code For SW Quality? Does It Make It Easier To Avoid Serious Defects?”

Static analysis tools are useful for finding serious programming errors and security vulnerabilities in source and binary code. Most static analysis testing tools work by searching code for known patterns or conditions to indicate programming errors or coding standards violations. In the past, static tool notifications were limited to problems that were predicted by theContinue reading “What Role Does AI Play In SW Testing Today? How Will Its Importance Change?”

In our experience, unfortunately I must say, that in many areas testing is not (yet) as extensive as would be desirable. The domain of safety-critical software is of course an exception. Here, industrial norms such as ISO 26262 for the automotive industry or DO-178C for aerospace stipulate that a given code coverage must be achievedContinue reading “Why Are There Still Critical Software Errors Even After Extensive Testing? Do Companies Concentrate Too Much On Functional Testing And Quick Go-To-Market?”

There have been many positive developments in the last few years. However, the biggest challenge continues to be that numerous companies still view software testing as a costly necessity rather than as a mean to reduce costs in the long run. Software tests, if applied correctly, not only increase software quality but also lower costsContinue reading “What Do You Think Are The Greatest Challenges In Software-Testing?”